Franke Schein is a author of several books and a freelance journalist whose articles have appeared in newspapers and magazines across the world. He writes from a street level perspective with a unique insight and style across a wide range of subjects. His articles appear on several websites in many different countries.
 |
Muslim Sulejman Talovic |
 |
Put away the illusion that the cold war has ended. As a matter of fact, it’s more sinister today, than before the Berlin Wall was taken down.
There is a very large Russian immigrant population in the US. many are former military members. I met the commander, and members of a Spetznaz unit
a few years ago.
http://en.ria.ru/russia/20131105/184530229/Belarus-to-Build-Aerial-Drones-in-Turkmenistan.html
Agenda-21 is a sinister plan being implemented by various world government, including the United States Government.
There has never been a more devious plan in the history of the world, until Agenda-21 was placed into action. A plan that would reconcile the world to the authority of the United Nations under the auspices of the Sustainability & Development Act. Coincidentally, the originators of Agenda-21 are each hard-core marxist’s that hate America, and everything that it represents.
“ Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st Century. It has been affirmed and modified at subsequent UN conferences.”
“ The United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21, but because Agenda 21 is not a treaty, the Senate was unable to hold a formal debate or vote on it. It is therefore not considered to be law under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution. Several congressmen and senators, however, have spoken in Congress in support of Agenda 21;these include Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator John Kerry, and Senator Harry Reid.
In the United States, over 528 cities are members of ICLEI, an international sustainability organization that helps to implement the Agenda 21 and Local Agenda 21 concepts across the world. The United States has nearly half of the ICLEI's global membership of 1,200 cities promoting sustainable development at a local level.The United States also has one of the most comprehensively documented Agenda 21 status reports. “
SOURCE:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
Earth Summit Agenda-21 Manual:
This is the manual that details the socialists plan to take over the world, force compliance through regulatory measures, and then begin a systematic process of eliminating critical infrastructure, civil rights, private land-ownership, and elimination of all national constitutions.
These devious plans would focus upon America by removing the US Constitution in its entirety. All rights would be eliminated, as each citizen would be forced to become part of a “collective society” living a cleaner, and more productive lifestyle in harmony with nature.
THIS IS NO JOKE-IT’S A SERIOUS AS IT CAN GET!
THE PRESIDENTS COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: (PCSD)
AREAS MARKED IN RED SHOULD BE A WARNING SIGN TO EVERYONE:
National Goals
The following goals express the shared aspirations of the President's Council on Sustainable Development. They are truly interdependent and flow from the Council's understanding that it is essential to seek economic prosperity, environmental protection, and social equity together.
Goal 1: Health And The Environment
Ensure that every person enjoys the benefits of clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment at home, at work, and at play.
Goal 2: Economic Prosperity
Sustain a healthy U.S. economy that grows sufficiently to create meaningful jobs, reduce poverty, and provide the opportunity for a high quality of life for all in an increasingly competitive world.
Goal 3: Equity
Ensure that all Americans are afforded justice and have the opportunity to achieve economic, environmental, and social well-being.
Goal 4: Conservation Of Nature
Use, conserve, protect, and restore natural resources -- land, air, water, and biodiversity -- in ways that help ensure long-term social, economic, and environmental benefits for ourselves and future generations.
Goal 5: Stewardship
Create a widely held ethic of stewardship that strongly encourages individuals, institutions, and corporations to take full responsibility for the economic, environmental, and social consequences of their actions.
Goal 6: Sustainable Communities
Encourage people to work together to create healthy communities where natural and historic resources are preserved, jobs are available, sprawl is contained, neighborhoods are secure, education is lifelong, transportation and health care are accessible, and all citizens have opportunities to improve the quality of their lives.
Goal 7: Civic Engagement
Create full opportunity for citizens, businesses, and communities to participate in and influence the natural resource, environmental, and economic decisions that affect them.
Goal 8: Population
Move toward stabilization of U.S. population.
Goal 9: International Responsibility
Take a leadership role in the development and implementation of global sustainable development policies, standards of conduct, and trade and foreign policies that further the achievement of sustainability.
Goal 10: Education
Ensure that all Americans have equal access to education and lifelong learning opportunities that will prepare them for meaningful work, a high quality of life, and an understanding of the concepts involved in sustainable development.
SOURCE:http://clinton4.nara.gov/PCSD/Overview/index.html
IF YOUR NOT WORRIED, THEN THIS SHOULD GET YOUR UNDIVIDED ATTENTION:
“Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, chaired by John D. Rockefeller III, which released a multivolume study of U.S. population growth and its impacts in 1972.
The Rockefeller Commission's most widely cited recommendation reads:
Recognizing that our population cannot grow indefinitely, and appreciating the advantages of moving now toward the stabilization of population, the Commission recommends that the nation welcome and plan for a stabilized population. “
The Commission report goes on to state, "In short, we find no convincing economic argument for continued national population growth."
SOURCE:http://clinton4.nara.gov/PCSD/Publications/TF_Reports/pop-chap-1.html
Here is one such proposal that would eliminate any doubt whatsoever about this sinister plan:
USING ECONOMIC POLICY INSTRUMENTS
POLICY RECOMMENDATION 1
Shifting Taxes
The federal government should reorient fiscal policy to shift the tax burden from labor and investment toward consumption, particularly consumption of natural resources, virgin materials, and goods and services that pose significant environmental risks. In this process, the federal government should seek replacement revenue measures that encourage maximum economic, energy, and materials use efficiency. Finally, in order to alleviate concerns about regressively, and, in fact, to promote a more progressive system of taxation, the federal government should offset consumption taxes at the lower end of the economic scale with corresponding reductions in payroll taxes.
This means that you would be taxed for everything that you use, even beyond the tax liabilities imposed currently. For example, water would be taxed, air would be taxed, cotton, wood, sand, clay, plastic, and every other natural resources used to build, manufacture, or make a product, would be heavily taxed. This also includes agricultural food products, vegetables, seeds, and textiles used for clothing.
But it doesn’t stop there:
If the commission decides that a certain activity, or product is harmful to the environment; it would then be eliminated altogether:
POLICY RECOMMENDATION 2
Reducing Inefficient and Environmentally Harmful Subsidies
Inefficient and environmentally harmful government subsidies, particularly those related to natural resource extraction and use, should be eliminated.
In short; anything that could cause a negative impact to the environment would be eliminated…
STILL NOT CONVINCED YET?
Agenda-21 would eliminate all private land-ownership. The population would be confined to living in “ Green Communities” that are a product of the Federal Government. In others words; they will seize all of the land, and force population resettlement in areas under their control.
Here it is in their own words:
NATURAL RESOURCE ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
But the problem is that they cant move 300 Million people into those areas. How will they accomplish this?
OBAMACARE DEATH PANELS
SYNOPSIS:
Agenda-21 In America: http://www.usda.gov/oce/sustainable/international.htm
178 World governments have become signatories to Agenda-21.
All of the air, water, minerals, and natural resources are brought under control of the United Nations
Private land-ownership would be eliminated, and the population forced to live in resettlement areas.
All civil rights are removed from the population, because there are no national constitutions allowed.
Military forces are disbanded entirely, except conscripts for global peacekeeping missions.
Private forearms are eliminated altogether, with force if necessary.
Food production would be taken over by the government, and tightly regulated, as well as rationed.
Jobs would be created to implement increased food production, but heavily taxed.
Child birth restrictions placed into effect.
Healthcare denied to chronic illness patients.
National Identification programs established
Travel restrictions enacted.
Private automobiles, and other gasoline operated vehicles eliminated.
Roads and highways destroyed, and reclaimed for agricultural use.
Burning wood, propane, charcoal, or other natural minerals would be outlawed.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE AGENDA-21 IN ACTION?
Hell Holes North Korea S Secret Prison Camps
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22161792#
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/8720870.stm
AGENDA-21 EXPLAINED
YOU’VE BEEN WARNED
What you do with this information is totally up to you, but understand that this is the greatest threat that America has ever faced, and its coming from inside our own elected government, as well as institutions of higher learning that are educating our children.
THE ALASKA WATCHMEN GROUP
RISK ANALYSIS & MITIGATION SUMMARY
The Soviet Threat To Alaska
SYNOPSIS:
Given the historical and existing current assumptions, as well as strategies involving the Soviet's Cold War era aspiration of Alaska; to wit, it's abundant natural resources, as well as Alaska's strategic location within the northern hemisphere; a thorough analysis of this prevalent threat is therefore required in order to arrive within a the framework of a predicated response which mitigates the omnipresent threat thereof.
Assumption #1:
Current global situations across the theater provide both a realistic, as well as favorable environment for an unprecedented incursion by the Soviet military apparatus into mainland Alaska territories.
The Russian geopolitical and economic situation(s) have reached a critical stage. Widespread dissatisfaction of Vladimir Putin's domestic and foreign polices has given rise to street level protests, some of which have turned deadly.
The primary hub of the Soviet Politburo has always been focused upon their maintaining the status quo within their organizational composition. Dissatisfaction has been historically dealt with at the extreme levels, or by carefully orchestrated deflection of the domestic issues through foreign interventionism; as was the case in the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
Assumption #2:
America and its NATO allies, as well as coalition partners, are presently involved within the scope of several multilevel regional conflict(s) which are quickly and disproportionately draining America's strategic reserves, both in the terms of resources and manpower, as well as public opinion.
Assumption #3:
Japan has recently fulfilled a multi-level commerce agreement with its arch-enemy The People's Republic of China. A deal that is viewed by the west as unprecedented, and gives potential for what many believed are a shift in the balance of power among Pan-Asian countries.
Japan is wholly reliant upon America and NATO for its defense, notwithstanding the empire's self-defense forces which are wholly inadequate in dealing with anything more than a local insurrection, or short-term conflicts within its own domicile.
Assumption #4:
The People's Republic of China has repeatedly warned America and NATO allies that interference with its domestic polices regarding Taiwan would harbor consequences. This is evidenced by the increasingly hostile attitude within the military stratocracy, and its aspiration for dominance within the Pan-Asian region; an area that China claims as sovereign territory--including Japan, the Philippines, Thailand, and other Pacific island within the circle of influence.
China's rapid military build-up, and the rearmament of the military services has grown exponentially over the last decade. Its current stockpile of short-range, and medium range missile, as well as its blue water naval capabilities, and strategic air assets; indicate a quiet reaffirmation of its foreign adventurism polices within the region.
Nuclear capabilities, as well as long-range delivery methods have likewise increased, as well as stealth fighter capabilities.
Assumption #5:
North Koreas continual tirade against its neighbors to the south, and threats of global nuclear conflicts have risen sharply since the demise of its former leader. North Korea's military governance has become increasingly hostile toward outsiders.
The primary supplier of weapons, armaments, and munitions to the North Korean military remains unchanged--China and Russia.
Assumption #6:
Given the volatile nature, as well as unpredictable tendencies of global economies, and the increasing shift in Asian attitudes towards the west; it should not surprise America and NATO when The People's Republic of China asserts its power against Taiwan through military force.
Intervention by America would create an immediate regional threat which has the capability to migrate into a global event. China's avowed partners include the Soviet Union, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and other Asian states.
American intercession would open the doors for other state players to enter the dispute; thereby creating opportunistic scenarios for the Soviet Union to fulfill its longstanding initiatives for the reacquisition of its former Alaskan territories.
Strategic Outlook:
Alaska is entirely dependent upon rail, maritime, roadway, and air transport of critical consumer, as well as defense inventories. Any minor disruption of these critical transportation system could create severe consequences for Alaska residents, as well as its military presence.
Within the scope of Alaska's territorial boundaries, certain geographic elements preclude rapid evacuation from affected areas. The ocean and mountainous barriers, as well as weather patterns create unfavorable conditions for a in-depth defensive stratagems. Given the technological advances, and weapons capability of the opponents, the Alaska military presence could offer but token resistance; much akin to the American strategic withdrawal into Seoul during the Korean conflict.
Alaska has little or no naval capability, and limited air capabilities. Given the Soviet invasion doctrine, the rapid development and employment of surface-to-air measures would greatly affect Alaska's air assets. The introduction of the SU-3000 missile system, as well as other delivery systems, likewise preclude air interdiction operations from within Canadian resources.
Soviet doctrines indicate a massed envelopment of the key facilities such as airfields, naval ports, commerce centers, as well as road junctures. Paratroop regiments and Spetnaz (Special Forces) could conceivably limit or restrict movement into or around denied areas; thereby creating static denial areas which preclude rapid facilitation of movement throughout the area; thereby limiting Alaskan mobility and/or tactical response(s).
Soviet naval transport forces, as well as air transportation capability would likely be utilized throughout Alaska, in an effort to secure key facilities. Within hours, the Soviets could transport several combat divisions into the areas already under their control.
It is theoretical that within three days, given the limited response capability within Alaska's military forces, that the Soviet Union could predictably occupy much of Alaska's cities, and other key strategic areas. It is without doubt that a "Denial of Opportunity" strategies employed by the Soviet forces could prevent rapid facilitation of reinforcements through Canada, or by sea lanes.
The proximity of Alaska to the Soviet Union, provides adequate defense in depth capabilities, as well as movement of critical supplies and additional follow-up forces.
Risk Mitigation & Response Strategies:
Understanding the geographical nature of Alaska, and its dependence upon outside resources, the military forces stationed within Alaska would be fighting on an asymmetrical forum. The defense would almost have to consists of delaying actions until reinforcements from other commands could arrive.
Given the current limited heavy armor, mechanized, and artillery disposition within the state's military organizational structures; it would be reasonable to assume an immediate, and potentially fatal assailment by Soviet military forces against these particular units.
Perhaps; in less than 72-hours the military presence in Alaska could be reduced to token levels of military resistance, if not a total capitulation of its forces into Soviet hands, as was the case during the Second World War Corregidor battles, whereby 30,000 combat troops surrendered to the Japanese forces due to lack of critical resources and reinforcement capabilities within the theater.
Key Response Strategies:
1. How would the Alaska State Guard be implemented in order to support Alaska's military forces?
2. Could a rapid draft of civilian citizens be mandated that would allow a swift integration into the overall defense of vital cities and/or population centers?
3. Are there sufficient military munitions inventories stockpiled in order to sustain multi-level protracted defensive actions?
4. Is it possible for Alaska to garrison adequate surface naval forces, as well as submarine capabilities to offset "denial of area" strategies utilized by a Soviet invasion?
5. What programs are currently active to protect vital government facilities, as well as civilian population centers?
6. Does Alaska maintain sufficient medical facilities, triage centers, and first echelon treatment capability to handle casualty rates of this nature?
ALASKA WATCHMEN GROUP
ADDENDUM TO RISK ANALYSIS & MITIGATION SUMMARY
Soviet Military Forces Disposition:
The Soviet military forces responsible for defense of the eastern region of the Soviet Union falls upon the Far Eastern Military District; a Red Banner Group commanded by Colonel-General O.L. Salyukov who assumed command in 2009.
The Far Eastern Military Districts is comprised of the following units:
14th Separate Brigade of Special Designation (Spetsnaz)
The 5th Army
The 35th Army,
HQ 68th Corps
Four Motor Rifle Divisions,
Four Machine-Gun/Artillery Divisions
83rd Airborne Brigade (With an incorporated light tank battalion)
635/654 and/or 954/598 Separate Airborne Battalions
Guards artillery battalion, and support units.
Ten units in the DVVO are now manned by contract servicemen.
Naval Forces Disposition:
Eastern Military District - Eastern Joint Strategic Command Pacific Fleet:
(1) Slava class cruiser
(1) Sovremennyy class destroyer
(4) Udaloy class destroyer
(3) Delta III class submarine
)2) Oscar class submarine
(5) Akula class submarine
(7) Kilo class submarine
The Pacific Fleet also includes coastal combatants such as corvettes and patrol ships, mine warfare vessels, support and logistic ships and light amphibious ships.
Naval Infantry:
9 motor-rifle brigades
1 tank brigade
1 Russian Airborne Troops brigade
1 Naval Infantry Brigade
7 bases for storage of weapons and equipment
Historical precedents accomplished by the Far Eastern Military District:
On August 20 Georgy Zhukov opened a major offensive with heavy air attack and three hours of artillery bombardment, after which three infantry divisions and five armoured brigades, supported by a fighter regiment and masses of artillery (57 thousand troops in total), stormed the 75,000 Japanese force deeply entrenched in the area. On August 23 the entire Japanese force found itself encircled, and on August 31 largely destroyed. Artillery and air attacks wiped out those Japanese who refused to surrender. Japan requested a cease-fire, and the conflict concluded with an agreement between the USSR, Mongolia and Japan signed on September 15 in Moscow. In the conflict, the Red Army losses were 9,703 killed in action (KIA) and missing in action (MIA) and 15,952 wounded. The Japanese lost 25,000 KIA; the grand total was 61,000 killed, missing, wounded and taken prisoner.
Shortly after the cease-fire, the Japanese negotiated access to the battlefields to collect their dead. Finding thousands upon thousands of dead bodies came as a further shock to the already shaken morale of the Japanese soldiers. The scale of the defeat probably became a major factor in discouraging a Japanese attack on the USSR during World War II, which allowed the Red Army to switch a large number of its Far Eastern troops into the European Theatre in the desperate autumn of 1941.
Summary of military units currently operating within the Far Eastern Military District:
Order of the Red Star Far Eastern Military District 2010:
Combat formations:
5th Army, in Ussuriysk
57th Guards Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade "Krasnodar"
59th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade, in Sergeyevka equipped with BMP
60th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade, in Kamen-Rybolov equipped with BMP
70th Guards Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade "Dukhovshchino-Khinganskaya", in Barabash equipped with MT-LBV
237th Reserve Base (89th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Bikin
245th Reserve Base (93rd Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Lesozavodsk
247th Reserve Base (94th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Sibirtsevo
35th Army, in Belogorsk
38th Guards Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade, in Yekaterinoslavka equipped with BMP
64th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade, in Khabarovsk equipped with BMP
69th Independent Brigade "Svir-Pomerania", in Babstovo
240th Reserve Base (90th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Belogorsk
243rd Reserve Base (92nd Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Khabarovsk
261st Reserve Base (95th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Mokhovaya Pad
18th Machine Gun-Artillery Division, in Goryachie Klyuchi
46th Machine Gun-Artillery Regiment
49th Machine Gun-Artillery Regiment
14th Independent Spetsnaz Brigade, in Ussuriysk
39th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade, in Khomutovo equipped with MT-LBV
83rd Independent Airborne Brigade, in Ussuriysk
230th Reserve Base (88th Independent Motor-Rifle Brigade), in Dachnoye
392nd District Training Center, in Knyaze-Volkonskoye
Missile and Artillery formations:
20th Guards Missile Brigade "Berlin", in Spassk-Dalny
107th Missile Brigade "Mozir", in Birobidzhan
165th Artillery Brigade "Prague", in Nikolskoye
305th Artillery Brigade, in Ussuriysk
338th Guards MLRS Brigade "Nevsko-Dvinskaya", Novosisoyevka
7020th Artillery Reserve Base "Kharbin", in Ussuriysk
7021st Artillery Reserve Base, in Nikolskoye
Air-Defense formations:
5th Army
8th Air-Defense Missile Brigade "Shavlinskaya" equipped with the Buk missile system
641st Air-Defense Command Center
35th Army
71st Air-Defense Missile Brigade equipped with the Buk missile system
643rd Air-Defense Command Center
Radar formations:
76th Independent Radio Technical Brigade, in Vyatskoye
94th Independent Radio Technical Battalion, in Ussuriysk (5th Army)
1889th Independent Radio Technical Battalion, in Belogorsk (35th Army)
Engineering formations:
37th Engineer Regiment (35th Army)
58th Engineer Regiment (5th Army)
2463rd Independent Engineer Battalion, in Ussuriysk
7027th Engineer Reserve Base
NBC-Defense formations:
16th Independent NBC-Defense Brigade, in Galkino
70th Independent Flamethrower Battalion, in Razdolnoye
122nd Independent NBC-Defense Battalion, in Ussuriysk (5th Army)
135th Independent NBC-Defense Battalion, in Khabarovsk (35th Army)
Signal formations:
17th Independent Electronic Warfare Brigade
104th (Communications Hub) Signal Brigade "Kluzh", in Khabarovsk
106th (Territorial) Signal Brigade
54th Signal Regiment (35th Army)
86th Signal Regiment (5th Army)
156th Independent (Rear) Signal Battalion
Conclusions:
[ The aforementioned assumptions are derived from my own research; and the following conclusions are likewise derived from my own research. The reader is advised to do his/her own research in order to arrive at their own conclusions. Franke Schein - March 30th 2012 - Anchorage, Alaska)
A quick analysis of the distance separating Alaska from the Russian Peninsula indicates that a mere 65(+/-) miles separates the two countries. 65-Nautical miles is nothing when considering the speed at which modern military formations are capable of producing.
Throughout the context of this document, it is clearly evident that the Far Eastern Military District is comprised of several Army Groups with attached support apparatus, as well as naval forces, and special forces units. The rapid deployment of these units, and their inherent cross-country capability is without doubt substantial in itself.
Unconfirmed analysis also indicates that at least four Hydro boats are deployed in the district, in order to facilitate rapid movement of combat regiments, light armor, and heavy armor units.
The several different airborne units, as well as the air-mobile units are part of the rapid deployment structure common to Soviet Doctrine of Warfare. The augmentation of several air-defense forces at both the Army Group, Divisional, and brigade levels; indicates a rapid response capability which matches the US capabilities in many degrees.
Artillery, chemical, military police, KGB, and other essential units are indigenous to the Military District's Operational structure.
What is concerning are the number of submarines laying just off Alaska's coastal areas; some of which have been updated with modern technologies and weapons delivery systems. It's would be feasible for these submarine forces to deny access to the Bearing Sea, or even the Pacific approaches that could be utilized by the US Naval Forces.
In all; there exists a colossal Soviet military force within quick striking distance of Alaska's shores. Given that the American military presence in Alaska is minimal; should a cross oceanic invasion occur, the Soviets would likely seize large swaths of strategic areas within Alaska, while denying the Alaska military forces movement capability.
I believe that American military force's only option would be to conduct delaying tactics while reinforcements from the lower-48 states could arrive. Much like the obstacles that US/ROK forces faced during the Korean war; would in all likelihood be repeated here in Alaska.
Soviet warfare doctrine has not change much since World War Two. Their advancement in weapons capabilities, as well as war-fighting and signals technology mirrors the achievement of the US. But, their special designation units, as well as advance teams would likely infiltrate into Alaska before the planned invasion. This is evidenced in the Soviets previous cross-border invasions since the 1915 era wars. Afghanistan, Chechnya, Georgia, and other break-away republics were dealt with in the same manner.
Historically the Airborne units, special forces, as well as air-mobile units would be the first echelon formation. Their movement would without doubt, be preceded by a massive air campaign against US Air force assets, as well as a rapid employment of anti-air units to counter any potential attacks by American air assets, and submarine based missile strikes against American artillery units.
Soviet Advance teams could feasible shut down major maritime ports, airfields, and highways leading away from the proposed naval landing areas. Follow-Up forces would include mechanized infantry, light and heavy tanks, as well as mobile rocket launchers and field artillery.
A gradual widening of the area, and pacification of the surrounding civilian areas would then be next on the roster. Pacification is normally carried out through intimidation by a strong show of force, or the outright executions of community leaders, resistance units, and captured military personnel.
Soviet doctrine dictates a rapid envelopment of key objectives, and control of roads, bridges, and government facilities within a 24-hour period. Follow-up forces then bring combined arms units (mechanized Infantry with heavy tank support) against strategic areas. Air defense and field artillery units are an integral parts of this doctrine.
These assumptions and conclusions are based upon an invasion forces seizing a single objective along Alaska's coastline. It's quite possible, and very likely, that several different ports and airfields across Alaska would be seized at the same time. If this is truly the case, then I submit that an asymmetrical war would greatly intensify the conflict beyonf what the Alaska based military is capable of dealing with.
meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
“President Hamid Karzai said a U.S. service member killed 16 people - nine of them children and three women - in a shooting spree Sunday that he condemned as "an assassination."
“Karzai demanded an explanation from the United States, adding new tensions to a relationship already severely strained over Americans burning Muslim holy books on a base in Afghanistan.”
Here you go Karzai; these are the faces of the sons and daughters of Americans that have fallen in that awful war. A war that began with terrorists in your country planning the wholesale murder of innocent Americans around the world. Let’s not forget that you were in Exile because there was a price on your head. You are free to walk in your own country because Americans gave you that freedom.
It’s been all over the news for months; Syrian rebel forces are fighting to overthrow the country’s despotic tyrant. Normal (everyday) people are getting fed-up with being controlled by petty dictators who rule with an iron fist.
But the situation in Syria goes far beyond what is being reported by the talking-heads of news networks: China, Russia, Iran, and Lebanon all have a vested interests in the events occurring in Syria today.
RUSSIA: The Soviet Union is the leading supplier of arms, munitions, and combat vehicles for the Bashar Assad’s regime. The Central Committee also views Syria as their last military presence in the mid-east region. One of their prime objectives for supporting the Assad regime is due largely to the Soviet’s long standing defiance against NATO’s missile shield.
Throughout the last century, Russia has been arming, training, and brokering deals with America’s hostile enemies. They are the worlds largest supporter of global terrorism. The cold war might have ended among the major news networks, but the truth is most evident since Vladimir Putin began restructuring of the Soviet Military, as well as its foreign policies.
Even though it may seem like “All Is Quiet On the Western Front”; make no mistake about it—Russia is actively at the forefront of maintaining its desire to make the word communist. Russia Delivers Missile System To China
In the coming months we will see where this situation leads us. I am of the opinion that the events in Syria are the beginning of something terrible; a creature that has been asleep for decades is now only just arising.
Critical threats faced throughout the next ninety days:
Solar Storms:
The GOES 12 through 15 spacecraft each carry a sophisticated Solar X-ray Imager to monitor the Sun’s X-rays for the early detection of solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and other phenomena that impact the geospace environment. This early warning is important because travelling solar disturbances affect not only the safety of humans in high-altitude missions, such as human spaceflight, but also military and commercial satellite communications. In addition, coronal mass ejections can damage long-distance electric power grids, causing extensive power blackouts.
Solar radiation is measured through many different scales. Each scale represents a severity class for humans and our electronics. The higher the class—the more intense and dangerous a solar storm
Geomagnetic Storms: disturbances in the geomagnetic field caused by gusts in the solar wind that blows by Earth.
Solar Radiation Storms: elevated levels of radiation that occur when the numbers of energetic particles increase.
Radio Blackouts: disturbances of the ionosphere caused by X-ray emissions from the Sun.
It’s important for survivalist and survival groups to monitor these space anomalies. Relying on the major news networks to keep informed might be a mistake. Here are some of the resources that I use:
[ Click the picture above to get Real Time Solar Wind Storm Information ]
[For further research information please click onto: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/index.html]
******
Iranian Oil Crisis:
Over the last few years I have written about the possibility that Iran would begin to ramp up their fifth column attacks when confronted with economic sanctions.
Last Sunday 30-year old Iranian Dissident was assassinated outside of her home in Texas. Gelareh Bagherzadeh was an outspoken critic of Iran's fledgling democracy. Her political activism got the attention of the military dictatorship ruling the Iranian people.
Sometime around midnight, according to the Daily Mail, Gelareh Bagherzadeh, a 30-year-old genetics student, was struck by a bullet that ripped through the passenger door window as she talked on the phone with her ex-boyfriend. According to police, an unknown assailant sneaked up to the passenger’s side of the 30-year-old’s car and shot her at point blank range in the head.
Bagherzadeh’s car motor was still running when she was shot, and it subsequently smashed into a garage door just steps from her parents’ home in an upscale community southwest of Houston, Texas. A neighbor heard the sound of the shattering glass and the running vehicle and called the police.
The major television personalities are just now starting to realize that this wasn’t murder—that Ms. Bagherzadeh was killed by Iranian Special Forces operatives that have infiltrated onto American soil through our loose and unsecured southern borders, or through inferior immigration polices. But this isn’t the first time that Iranian terrorist have struck in the USA:
Amid the crisis centering around Iran; arises the looming specter of war. Throughout the last year Iran has stepped-up it’s nuclear weapons program; kidnapped several American citizens, and recently imposed the Death Sentence on another American charged with spying.
Iran’s constant barrage of military rhetoric against America, Israel, and western countries has progressively worsened to the point that Iran's military forces have threatened to close down the Strait of Hormuz; a move threat that is taken very serious by every nation on the globe.
Iranian Submarine Forces
Iran’s Space Program Launch Center
Iranian Gunboats Conducting Maneuvers In The Strait Of Hormuz
Iranian Special Forces Trained Narco-Drug Cartel Paramilitary Units
